Structural Closure and Exposure: Market Reactions to Acquisitions and Divestitures
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper develops an exchange-network perspective on corporate diversification and proposes two measures of corporate scope: structural closure and structural exposure. Structural closure focuses on exchanges of goods and services inside the firm and proxies for the potential costs of undertaking them through the market instead. By considering exchange relations inside the firm, this measure complements the existing indices that focus on asset relatedness. Structural exposure focuses on exchanges of goods and services across the firm boundary and proxies for the current market-exchange costs as compared to undertaking them inside the firm instead. By focusing on exchanges across the firm boundary, the measure extends the existing approaches in that it captures what the firm could integrate, but decided not to. We posit that higher structural closure will increase firm value, while higher structural exposure will reduce it. We test these hypotheses using stock market reactions to acquisitions and divestitures undertaken by Fortune 100 firms between 1979 and 1992. We find that acquisitions that increase firm structural closure increase firm value, but those that increase structural exposure diminish it. We find equivalent results for divestitures.
منابع مشابه
The Choice among Acquisitions, Alliances, and Divestitures
This paper investigates how firms choose among acquisitions, alliances, and divestitures when they decide to expand or contract their boundaries. The dataset covers 9276 deals announced and completed by 86 members of the Fortune 100 between 1990 and 2000. Our findings support explanations based on resources, transaction costs, internalization, organizational learning, social embeddedness, asymm...
متن کاملConsolidation in Food Retailing: Prospects for Consumers and Grocery Suppliers
unprecedented consolidation and structural change through mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, internal growth, and new competitors. Since 1996, almost 3,500 supermarkets have been purchased, representing annual grocery store sales of more than $67 billion (including food and non-food sales by supermarkets, superettes, and convenience stores). Two of the largest food retailing combinations in h...
متن کاملThe Human Factor in Acquisitions
Why do firms diversify into unrelated product markets? Internal labor markets allow firms to reallocate workers in response to industry shocks. They also strengthen workers’ incentives to invest in transferable, productivity-enhancing skills. Thus, the transferability of human capital can be a source of merger synergies. To test this hypothesis, we construct an index of human capital transferab...
متن کاملKnow The Capacity Closure Analysis In Horizontal Mergers
The U.S. antitrust agencies have long evaluated mergers in homogeneous product markets to determine “whether the merged firm will find it profitable unilaterally to suppress output and elevate the market price.”[1] But the U.S. Department of Justice had not publicly disclosed a formal economic method to analyze output suppression concerns until 2007, when it required two large newsprint manufac...
متن کاملWhat drives mergers and acquisitions waves in developing countries? Evidences from Iranian banking industry
M any Middle-East countries, like Iran, have dynamic banking industries and have observed merger and acquisitions (M&A) waves. M&A waves are usually defined in the developed world context and some of their main drivers were identified as: market timing, environment's shocks, merger manias, government regulation and regulatory, and technological changes. It has been discussed that merger waves ...
متن کامل